
A federal judge in New York has denied the Department of Justice's request to make public the grand jury materials from its 2019 sex trafficking case against the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. The ruling effectively halts the Trump administration's effort to release the sealed testimony and exhibits, prioritizing the traditional secrecy of grand jury proceedings over arguments for public transparency.
In his decision, U.S. District Judge Richard Berman stated that government lawyers failed to meet the exceptionally high legal standard required to unseal such records. Judge Berman's ruling noted that the Justice Department already possesses a "trove" of documents from its comprehensive investigation into Epstein, suggesting the information contained in the sealed materials was relatively small compared to what the government already holds. This finding was a significant factor in his decision to maintain the confidentiality of the proceedings.
This was the third and final judicial rejection of the DOJ's bid to release Epstein-related grand jury files. Another federal judge presiding over the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend and associate, had previously turned down a similar government request. With Wednesday's ruling, the courts have effectively closed the door on this avenue for disclosure, barring a successful appeal.
Despite the setback in court, the push for transparency is not entirely over. While the grand jury transcripts will remain sealed, the Department of Justice plans to move forward with sharing other files related to the Epstein investigation directly with Congress later this week, according to reports. This move ensures that while judicial precedent on grand jury secrecy is upheld, congressional oversight can continue with access to a different set of documents concerning the case that has captivated public interest.



