New York Judge Blocks Texas Lawsuit in Key Test of Abortion Shield Law

New York State Supreme Court building

A New York judge has dismissed a legal challenge from Texas that sought to enforce a civil judgment against a New York doctor for prescribing abortion pills to a Texas resident. The ruling marks a significant early test of so-called "shield laws" designed to protect medical providers who offer reproductive care to patients from states with restrictive abortion bans.

On Friday, Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Lisa Cairo blocked an attempt to make a New York doctor, Linda Prine, pay a judgment of over $100,000 awarded in a Texas court. The original Texas lawsuit was filed by the ex-husband of a woman who obtained the pills in 2023. He sued Dr. Prine under a Texas law that allows private citizens to bring civil action against anyone who “aids or abets” an abortion. This case has been closely watched as it represents one of the first major challenges to the legal protections enacted by states like New York following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

In her decision, Justice Cairo cited New York's public policy, which safeguards reproductive health care as a fundamental right. She ruled that enforcing the Texas judgment would be contrary to New York's own laws. The case was seen as a crucial moment for testing the limits of interstate legal battles over abortion access. The New York shield law, passed in 2023, explicitly prohibits state courts from enforcing civil judgments from other states related to the provision of legal reproductive health services.

New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office defended the doctor, praised the dismissal as a “momentous victory for reproductive freedom.” The decision serves as a powerful precedent for health care providers in the more than a dozen states that have enacted similar shield laws. It affirms that these laws can effectively protect doctors and patients from legal repercussions originating in states with near-total abortion bans. The ruling is considered by many to be a significant victory for abortion rights advocates, though it remains unclear if Texas officials, including Attorney General Ken Paxton, will pursue an appeal. The legal team for Dr. Prine stated that the ruling ensures providers can continue to offer care without fear of retaliation from states that have criminalized abortion. The involvement of Texas's attorney general highlights the ongoing and politically charged nature of these interstate legal conflicts.